David and Goliath: Dr. Charlene Ashley Takes on Juliet Holness in a Landmark Property Dispute

In the idyllic setting of Red Hills, Jamaica, a dramatic legal battle is unfolding between Dr. Charlene Ashley, a distinguished International Business Strategist, and developer Juliet Holness, wife of Jamaica’s Prime Minister. At the heart of the controversy lies an $800-million apartment complex that allegedly threatens Dr. Ashley’s property and raises questions about urban planning, ethics, and property rights.

The Truth Behind the Challenge

Dr. Ashley’s grievances against the development are rooted in a series of alleged breaches of building codes, regulatory approvals, and fundamental property rights. The Forest Hills Civic Association (FHCA) has also raised alarms about issues such as excessive density, inadequate parking provisions, and the potential ecological harm to the area. The challenge Dr. Ashley faces is emblematic of the larger David-and-Goliath struggle—one woman standing up against a powerful developer connected to the highest political office in the land.

The Vulgarity of Breaches

The project on Lots 21A and 21B in Leas Flat has reportedly flouted multiple conditions outlined by the Kingston and St. Andrew Municipal Corporation (KSAMC) and the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA). Among the most egregious allegations are the following:

  • Density Violations: The approved development allegedly exceeds the maximum 30 habitable rooms per acre allowed in the Red Hills area, with some reports suggesting the construction includes over 100 habitable rooms. Residents were shocked to learn that the Prime Minister’s wife has received approvals for increased density with plans showing approvals for and additional apartment block and an additional townhouse block increasing the densities even further.
  • Building Height: Despite approvals permitting three stories, residents claim that a five-story structure has been built, effectively reclassifying two lower floors as basements.
  • Green Space: The development appears to lack adequate green space, with the primary designated areas being Dr Ashley’s home (which was not sold to Holness) lot. 
  • Sewage Contamination: Concerns have also been raised about a poorly designed sewage system that could contaminate the local water table which serves the entire Red Hills area, impacting residents far beyond the Leas Flat community.

Is KSAMC Afraid?

Questions loom over the regulatory bodies tasked with ensuring compliance. Residents have accused the KSAMC and NEPA of turning a blind eye to the project’s breaches. The Forest Hills community’s struggle to gain timely access to development plans—a process that took some years.  After being forced to apply for access to the drawings under the country’s “Access to Information Act” legally mandated 30 days turned into seven months highlighting systemic obstacles that favor not only developers but further powerful politicians over residents.

Suing for Land Not Paid For

One of the most striking allegations is the incorporation of the back of Dr. Ashley’s lot as part of the development’s green and recreational space without her consent. Despite owning this land, Dr. Ashley has faced immense pressure to yield to the Holness’ demands. Holness who has had undisturbed access for some 13 years, is said to have only paid a deposit on the land. Regardless, the Prime Minister’s wife has carried Ashley to court for not delivering the title for the land on which only a deposit has been paid. The situation raises profound ethical and legal questions about property rights and development practices in Jamaica.

15 Years and Still No Title

Compounding the injustice, Dr. Ashley alleges that despite not yet receiving full payment for the land sold to Mrs Holness, she has not only been forced to hand over the title without receiving payment, but further Holness is said to have partnered with the Registrar of Title in having the Registrar  (who represents the Government of Jamaica) to put a caveat under 15c which does not allow Ashley to make any changes to her home, such as repairing or installing walls, etc,  situation that adds a layer of vulnerability to her battle and her personal security as it is alleged that Holness knocked down several walls which  dividing structures between Ashley’s home and the development. Residents believe this was in a ploy to ensure that agencies would see 1 large property that includes Ashley’s home when investigating any complaints. Developers leveraging bureaucratic delays to exploit property owners is a recurring theme in similar disputes across Jamaica.

The Lady from Leas Flat: Fighting for What’s Right

Dr. Ashley is not just fighting for her property; she is advocating for the integrity of the community and the rule of law. Her efforts have garnered the support of local residents and environmentalists, many of whom are alarmed by the rapid transformation of Red Hills. The erosion of community character and environmental degradation are among the many unintended consequences of unchecked urban development.  Under currents are that Holness was shocked at how quickly the residents came together in support.  After much ado Holness is said to have agreed to a meeting with the residents for which she never appeared – this was said to be the largest gathering of residents for Red Hills to ever be documented.  In attendance were several advocacy groups, lawyers, urban planners, architects and residents from numerous communities within the Red Hills area.

Charlene Takes on the Globe

Dr. Ashley is not new to challenges. Her career—spanning over 25 years—is a testament to her resilience and strategic thinking. From pioneering business strategies and marketing campaigns for global corporations to mentoring young entrepreneurs, Dr. Ashley embodies the qualities of confidence, gentleness, and care. These attributes now fuel her battle against what she perceives as an overreach by Holness’s development project.

Be Gentle, Be Confident, Be Caring and Peaceful

Dr. Ashley’s approach is not only focussed but also principled. She has emphasized the importance of community dialogue, environmental stewardship, and adherence to the rule of law. Her fight is as much about inspiring systemic change as it is about personal justice.

Will the Truth Win?

As public scrutiny intensifies, the battle’s outcome will set a precedent for future developments in Jamaica. Will regulatory agencies step up to enforce compliance? Will communities like Forest Hills be able to protect their unique character? Most importantly, will Dr. Ashley’s steadfastness inspire a broader movement toward transparency and equity in urban planning?

The Uptown Don or Donette: She Sees It, She Wants It, She Takes It

Critics of the development have likened Holness’s approach to that of a “Donette”—a figure who uses power and connections to override the rights of others. This narrative underscores the imbalance of power in disputes like these, where private citizens often lack the resources to counter politically connected entities.

Focus on Goals: Actions of Today Are Creating Tomorrow

For Dr. Ashley, this battle is not just about stopping a single development but about preserving a way of life and holding powerful entities accountable. Her fight exemplifies the importance of standing firm against injustice, no matter how daunting the odds. In her own words, “The actions of today are creating our tomorrow.”

Conclusion

The ongoing dispute between Dr. Charlene Ashley and Juliet Holness is a microcosm of broader issues in urban development—from ethical governance to environmental sustainability. As the case unfolds, the outcome will undoubtedly reverberate beyond Leas Flat, serving as a litmus test for Jamaica’s commitment to fairness, transparency, and the rule of law.


For further reading visit:

Leave a comment